Terrain layout: ideas and constraints

Wheeze_NL ifcat at uberia.nl
Fri Jan 15 14:14:54 CET 2021


I think we all get it, I'll see (virtually) you on Saturday!

Op vr 15 jan. 2021 om 14:13 schreef Manduca <manduca at mch2021.org>:

> I’ll be there (virtually).
> No, nothing has happened much except me talking to Atilla and Boels.
>
> If been out of productivity a lot due to the COVID-19 situation
> (homeschooling) and work.
>
> Will try to kickstart when things settle down again.
>
> On 14 Jan 2021, at 23:26, Wheeze_NL <ifcat at uberia.nl> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi,
>
> Are you all there this saturday?
> Has anything been discussed off-list perhaps?
>
> Hope to hear you all this saturday!
>
> Wheeze_NL
>
> Op di 24 nov. 2020 om 21:32 schreef Ruud Koolen <redlizard at redlizard.nl>:
>
>> Dear Team:Warehouse,
>>
>> It's high time we got going on getting a rough version of the MCH2021
>> terrain
>> layout together.
>>
>> Despite the mantra of copy/paste/improve, the plan is not to use the
>> layout
>> from SHA2017 as an authoritative baseline. Many things have changed since
>> four years ago, and many lessons were learned; so we are going to take a
>> fresh look at the space we have and how to fill it, taking into account
>> new
>> opportunities, new restrictions, and feedback about what worked well and
>> what
>> did not.
>>
>> In that context, I'd like to hear what your team would like the terrain
>> layout
>> to look like. What big space-using things are you going to be organizing,
>> that need a spot? And does your team have strong opinions about where
>> those
>> things should go, or where other general-purpose things should go
>> relative to
>> each other? Are there things that need to be close to other things, or
>> far
>> away from other things, or with access to particular infrastructure, for
>> your
>> team to be able to do its job? And are there such constraints that are
>> not
>> strictly necessary, but which would be very convenient if it can be
>> arranged?
>>
>> I have given my best estimates of the answers to the questions, listed
>> below;
>> but these are certain to be complete. If you could send me a mail with
>> all
>> the things I inevitably missed, I'd be much obliged. General feedback on
>> what
>> you'd like to see changed, or what worked very nicely last time and what
>> you
>> would like me to not touch, are also very welcome.
>>
>> If mail is not sufficient, and you'd like to talk it over in more detail
>> and/or draw things on whiteboards, ping me on IRC and we'll set something
>> up.
>> Or join tomorrow's mumble meeting, and yell at me.
>>
>> On the topic of tomorrow's mumble meeting, I would be very happy with
>> some
>> ideas, wishlists, and inspiration about terrain layout from a broad
>> audience.
>> So by all means, join the discussion tomorrow, and tell me all about what
>> needs to move and what should stay right where it is, and why.
>>
>> ----------
>> >What big space-using things are you going to be organizing, that need a
>> spot?
>> - Logistics warehouse
>>
>> >And does your team have strong opinions about where those things should
>> go,
>> or where other general-purpose things should go relative to each other?
>> - Warehouse should be reasonably central, and close to volunteering hub
>> - Warehouse should be reasonably accessible by road
>> - Warehouse should have some outdoors space available to it
>> ----------
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Team:Terrain
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mch2021.org/pipermail/logistics/attachments/20210115/8b8f22e3/attachment.html>


More information about the Logistics mailing list