[MCH Team:Info] [Content] When will the blog posts be online?

[Noor]

Hi Claudia,

Yeah, it's still something I'm figuring out as we go along. It's only the
very beginning.

I'm realizing, for example, pads and email threads are not ideal for going
over proofreading/minor editing issues with the author(s). Hence my
suggestion of a quick chat for going over everything one by one.

Style differences are fine and I'm not going to be heavy-handed. But if
wording is awkward and clearly not written by a native speaker, I will
suggest minor changes to make things sound more natural, flow better, or
reduce ambiguities.

As for the *how* of going about proofreads/edits, it's something we'll
figure out along the way. I like the idea of a quick IRC or other text chat
(also so we can get to publishing within the specified three days), but
there may be issues with that as well. We'll have to figure out what works.

Thanks,

Noor

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:14 PM Claudia.Borges <claudia.borges at xs4all.nl>
wrote:

> Just because I may have sound horrible: Please don't read as critic to
> no one. I just have the need to refresh the agreements on the process,
> but this might be just me.
>
>
>
>
> Claudia.Borges via Content schreef op 2020-11-25 22:10:
>
> > Noor schreef op 2020-11-25 21:01:
> >
> >> I'd rather not use the pad, I think. It gets messy and annoying with
> >> all the copypasting going back and forth between the pad and
> >> WordPress.
> >>
> >> If we can't do a chat via IRC or something similar soon, I'll just
> >> start an email thread with just you and Robin and go over the
> >> remaining few issues one by one.
> >>
> >> Noor
> >
> > Before we spend several hours of our precious time going back and forth
> > with emails and chats discussing every point on this small text, I
> > would like to have a conversation on the expectations around the
> > process of publishing a blog post.
> >
> > I was under the impression both teams had made an agreement where posts
> > from the team content would have proofreading but no edition. Team
> > content needs to be able to decide on what and how we want to convey
> > what we think we should so to get the speakers we want. Confusion
> > around this conversation may be a reason we are spending too much of
> > our time with the text.
> >
> > Even if I have misunderstood the process, I think this is a nice
> > conversation to have.
> > Therefore, dear team members, shall we re access this conversation?
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Claudia
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> > Content mailing list
> > Content at lists.ifcat.org
> > https://lists.ifcat.org/mailman/listinfo/content
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > CFP: https://cfp.mch2021.org
> > Sponsoring: https://wiki.mch2021.org/Sponsoring
> >
> > OUR WIKI PAGE
> > https://wiki.ifcat.org/Team:Content
> >
> > NEXT MEETING
> > Online November 28, 17:00-18:00
> > https://wiki.ifcat.org/2020-11-28-Content-meeting
> >
> > MINUTES PREVIOUS MEETING
> > https://wiki.mch2021.org/2020-11-14-Content-meeting-minutes
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mch2021.org/pipermail/info/attachments/20201125/fb5331ea/attachment.html>